SENATE MAJORITY LEADER, REPUBLICAN MIKE "THE STOPPER" BISHOP HAS WORKED TO DENY CIVIL JUSTICE TO MICHIGAN'S INNOCENT INJURY VICTIMS, HOW WILL MICHIGAN' INNOCENT CRIME VICTIMS FARE WITH HIM AS ATTORNEY GENERAL?
Michigan Senate Majority leader, Republican Mike Bishop wants to be Michigan's next Attorney General. Presumably he wants to stop crime, punish the guilty and obtain justice for innocent victims of crime. Mike, "the Crimestopper" Bishop. Sounds nice.
I also assume that Senator Bishop's passion to serve the people of the state of Michigan as their chief legal officer is based in part on the fact that he is term limited in his current office and can't run again in 2010. Mr. Bishop did try to repeal those term limits during his current term in office, without success.
Mr. Bishop has experience as a "Stopper", in fact using that term to describe his role in the Senate when he used his power to prevent a House passed bill to repeal Michigan's Drug Immunity Law from even coming to a vote on the Senate floor. Michigan is the only state in the Union with such a law, and the most recent House bill to repeal the law came after the US Supreme Court struck down the rationale behind the law in the recent case of Wyeth v Levine (not a case arising under the Michigan law).
When the immunity repeal bill subsequently passed the Michigan House, Bishop said he did not intend to allow a vote on it in the Senate. And he didn't. As he stated at the time, "There are some things I have to be a stopper for. I don't have any intention of taking this issue up." Sounds rather imperious to me. One man's power can stop remedial legislation in its tracks.
The Bishop thinks that the Michigan-only drug immunity law keeps drug company jobs in Michigan. Yet, a recent study found the number of Michigan residents employed by private bio science companies declined by 10.5 percent from 2002-2006, largely because pharmaceutical companies pulled out.
I am sure Bishop's response would be that he saved many more jobs from being lost by opposing the drug immunity law repeal. Brilliant.
The drug immunity law issue is not the first time the Bishop has acted as a civil justice "stopper". In the area of auto negligence law, insurance companies have fought long and hard to restrict the rights of injured persons to compensation for their injuries. In the the mid-Nineties Republican majorities in the Michigan Legislature passed tort reform bills twice rejected by Michigan voters as ballot initiatives. Those laws were interpreted by a Republican majority on the Michigan Supreme Court, a majority substantially hand-picked by Republican Governor John Engler. The culmination of this multi-pronged attack on the rights of injured citizens to seek compensation from those who had hurt them was the 2004 Supreme Court case of Kreiner v Fischer, which held that, in order to be compensated for injuries caused by a careless driver, a victim's injuries would have to affect the "course and trajectory" of his life. Thereafter, reviewing courts in Michigan took this to mean that only proof of a permanent, devastating, life altering injury would be considered serious.
Continue reading "BISH THROWS MITRE IN THE RING FOR MICHIGAN AG" »

